this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
169 points (89.7% liked)

Games

32634 readers
737 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
quinten@lemmy.world
shitpostpolice@lemmy.world
Dremor@lemmy.world
Dremor@jlai.lu
169
Overwatch 2 is finally bringing back 6v6 with tests to decide OW’s future (www.dexerto.com)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by simple@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world
77 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Lol. After all these years they're thinking of rolling back the 5v5 changes. To quote someone from Reddit:

PVE was dropped, heroes are free again, and now 6v6 is back. Blizzard spent the last couple of years turning overwatch 2 back into Overwatch 1.

Edit: See also the developer's blog post about this, which goes into great detail explaining their decisions over the year and how we got here. Really worth a read if you are (or were) an OW player.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So why did they drop the team numbers from 6 to 5? Does it really make that much of a difference? Couldn't they just have both modes available (like Halo has 16v16, 32v32 and such)?

[–] warm@kbin.earth 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It makes a massive difference, the game was balanced with 6v6 from the get go, removing a tank completely changes how the game works.

They had problems with certain tank combinations, but instead of addressing that directly, they just removed one. A lot of changes they made just felt like justifications to calling it a 'new game'.

The devs are too proud to add a 6v6 mode along side, it's took so much pressure for them to finally 'experiment' with 6v6, they just won't admit their modes, changes etc are failures.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It also essentially undermines the whole idea of the game. "More FPS focus" and "more focus on individual gameplay" are not why I enjoyed OW1 in the first place, after all. It was the game to play with real life friends while hanging out on voice chat and relaxing after work. The mix of high-precision, low-precision, no-precision, tanking, healing, everything meant that there was something for everybody and we could all easily play together and just spend an evening talking shit and doing shit.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

They want everyone to feel powerful on every hero (to sell skins), but that's not Overwatch's identity. They took a lot of skill expression and teamplay out of the game.

I mean the devs are completely clueless anyway, they removed mccrees stun citing "too much CC in the game" while simultaneously adding more CC through both new heros and changing existing ones. Just reading their patch notes shows how lost they are.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Oh the grenade part was so silly. "Hey we are removing the stun, too much CC and let's be honest, it makes it far too easy to blow up stunned flankers".

...

"Here, as a replacement that's a homing grenade that just straight up kills the flanker, no stunning necessary."

Okay, I guess. 🤷

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

It's worth it to read the director's take that goes with this announcement, it's quite long but goes into great detail about the motivation and effects.

I hate the change, but I can totally understand why they did it. Much as I personally dislike it.