this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Europe

8488 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Killing_Spark@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That sentence is so general that it has to be wrong.

  1. One could imagine a religion that bases it's belief on the scientific method
  2. Education does not necessarily mean it's all based on scientific facts

But let's assume you meant that "The currently most practiced religions are teaching something that is not aligned with the scientific method and facts we want to educate people on in the public education system".

Even then you are still saying just by being religious you are disrespecting the educational facility. But again let's assume you only meant that showing that your belief in this religion is disrepectful.

I'd argue that a school is still a public place, where minors are forced to be a big part of their waking day, where they should be free to express themselves. That may include challenging religious beliefs but also the teachings in the school, as long as it happens in a respectful way. Challenging ideas and disagreeing is not the same as disrespect.

[–] sederx@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

One could imagine a religion that bases it’s belief on the scientific method

it doesnt make any sense,religions are about dogmas not evidence. if they are based on science they are not a religion by definition.

Education does not necessarily mean it’s all based on scientific facts

ideally it all is. just because we are not smart enough doesnt mean we should entertain stuff that has even LESS validity, like religions.

where they should be free to express themselves

no child gives a flying bird about "expressing their religion" they are only religious because their parents are forcing them to. no other reason.

so no the right of the parents to express their own religion through their unwilling kids doesnt trump anything about an education syste.

[–] Killing_Spark@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it doesnt make any sense,religions are about dogmas not evidence. if they are based on science they are not a religion by definition.

Citing Wikipedia here:

Religion is a range of social-cultural systems, including designated behaviors and practices, morals, beliefs, worldviews, texts, sanctified places, prophecies, ethics, or organizations, that generally relate humanity to supernatural, transcendental, and spiritual elements[1]—although there is no scholarly consensus over what precisely constitutes a religion.[2][3] Different religions may or may not contain various elements ranging from the divine,[4] sacredness,[5] faith,[6] and a supernatural being or beings.[7]

I'd say I could build a belief system around "designated behaviors and practices, morals, beliefs, worldviews, texts, sanctified places, prophecies, ethics, or organizations" that tries to understand the "supernatural, transcendental, and spiritual elements" by using scientific methods. Where "supernatural, transcendental, and spiritual elements" are just stuff we don't yet understand like for example dark matter.

Education does not necessarily mean it’s all based on scientific facts

ideally it all is. just because we are not smart enough doesnt mean we should entertain stuff that has even LESS validity, like religions.

Try teaching ethics based on only scientific facts then. Try teaching art and music based on scientific fact. Those are disciplines where opinions and feelings have a meaningful impact on the subject at hand.

no child gives a flying bird about “expressing their religion” they are only religious because their parents are forcing them to. no other reason.

so no the right of the parents to express their own religion through their unwilling kids doesnt trump anything about an education syste.

You do understand that people in schools are not just 6 years old kids right? A big chunk of them are old enough to make decisions about themselves. Calling all of these individuals "unwilling kids" because they might be religious is very belittling.

[–] sederx@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Calling all of these individuals “unwilling kids” because they might be religious is very belittling.

none of those people sat down and said " i want to become a christian". speaking about this like its a choice is really messed up, children dont have a choice.

[–] Killing_Spark@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I did not sit down to be raised an atheist and yet here I am, raised as one without having had a choice. Parents have the right to raise their children as they see fit, within some parameters of course. And I think that is a good thing, I wouldn't want anyone to force me to raise my kids in a specific way. At a certain age teenagers are able to have their own thoughts though, and there are a lot of people that turn away from the beliefs of their parents. Others stay religious though and I think that is absolutely fine. I might not agree with a lot of what they believe in, but it also is just none of my business.

[–] sederx@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

children being abused with brainwashing is absolutely your business even if you dont understand it.

just because you managed to escape it doesnt mean the average child is able to. look around, they clearly are not.

[–] Killing_Spark@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

children being abused with brainwashing is absolutely your business even if you dont understand it.

Being raised religiously is definitely not generally abuse, and I would say only a very small portion of it goes into abusive territory. Which, of course, yes should be everyones business.

just because you managed to escape it doesnt mean the average child is able to. look around, they clearly are not.

I did not escape anything, I am still an atheist. What I am saying is that it's not inherently better to "escape" religion than to keep believing. I would even oppose that framing of religion being something you need to escape.

[–] sederx@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would even oppose that framing of religion being something you need to escape.

give one positive.

sorry but you centrist people can really go to absurd places just to be right...

[–] Killing_Spark@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

give one positive.

  1. Strong community bonding, most people are social animals that like being associated with a group
  2. Giving sense to charitable actions that they would otherwise not perform
  3. A general sense of security and comfort

As I said I myself am not religious. It doesn't work for me. But to just flat out deny that religion has benefits to people is blatantly dismissive of the things that make a lot of people happy.

sorry but you centrist people can really go to absurd places just to be right…

If we are going to get down to namecalling here you go: You libs can really go to absurd places just to prove that pure logic and rationality will make us prosper.