Asklemmy

43958 readers

1145 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

141

What would you like to change about Lemmy culture? (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 4 months ago by PinkyCoyote@sopuli.xyz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

436 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There's no monetary profit, but I could absolutely see competition for whose ideas gain the most support.

And the Fediverse does not collectively own all the instances. Each instance is created and supported by an individual or small group of individuals.

You can even see the failures of unregulated capitslism in how lemmy (especially lemmy.ml and lemmy.world) are consolidating users and engagement. Unregulated capitalism trends towards monopoly.

It's an extremely apt metaphor for capitalism.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There's no monetary profit, but I could absolutely see competition for whose ideas gain the most support.

Capitalism is not "competition," it is a specific mode of production. Competition exists outside Capitalism.

And the Fediverse does not collectively own all the instances. Each instance is created and supported by an individual or small group of individuals.

The source code is open and free, ergo people can do what they want. The underlying tools are accessible to anyone, the instances are not "production" nor do they exist for exchange.

You can even see the failures of unregulated capitslism in how lemmy (especially lemmy.ml and lemmy.world) are consolidating users and engagement. Unregulated capitalism trends towards monopoly.

There is no Capitalism on Lemmy, lmao.

It's an extremely apt metaphor for capitalism.

No it isn't.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The source code is open and free, ergo people can do what they want.

You really don't see the parallels between this statement and "anyone can become a millionaire"?

Not everyone has the opportunity or the skillset to "do what they want" with the source code. I'm not a coder. How can I do whatever I want? I'm beholden to the structures that other people build.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You really don't see the parallels between this statement and "anyone can become a millionaire"?

There's a chance you could stumble onto a point if Lemmy was profit-driven.

Not everyone has the opportunity or the skillset to "do what they want" with the source code. I'm not a coder. How can I do whatever I want? I'm beholden to the structures that other people build.

You don't need to be in order to be able to download the source code. Skills are not ownership.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sure I can downland a thing. But what can I DO with it?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Whatever you want. You're drawing conclusions that do not follow.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

You're being obtuse.