this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
41 points (95.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

5205 readers
1078 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Darohan@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

The more properties you own, the more tax you pay on the price of the next one - excluding if you only own one, but escalating quickly after like 3 or 4.

[–] Dalvoron@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Linear housing, quadratic taxes

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

This is so obviously what needs to happen. The fact that it hasn't says everything you need to know about current governments.

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Texas is that way to a point. Your primary residence gets enormous tax breaks. Any property after that, fuck you, pay up. The downside to that is that it contributes to the high cost of rent as the owner passes it along to the tenant.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

Does it increase per property owned though? They can't keep passing on the tax increase to the tenant if at a certain point they own 1000 houses and now their tax on the last one is 7 times higher than the rent on it.

That's what we should be doing any house after your second gets increased a ton per house. Make it untenable for people to own rental properties. I don't mind someone having a vacation house or two if they can afford it. But nobody needs 10 vacation houses, they're rental or investment properties at that point so fuck them.

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Serious question, couldn't you bypass this by just setting up different LLCs that only have one or two properties under them?

[–] Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

They already do this. In my old job, the boss had 0 properties, he just used company money, company cars etc and had multiple of them

[–] Kayana@ttrpg.network 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Possible formula: Tax for n-th house = n-th Fibonacci number + 5 * max(0, n - 2). So low numbers like three get penalized by that linear part, and high numbers grow exponentially due to the Fibonacci number.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Ok now it's starting to get confusing enough to fit into our tax system. Can we add more variables? Lol