this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
1185 points (97.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5353 readers
2662 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PopShark@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Really?

Can you provide sources?

[–] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure if what this person said is correct, but I can corroborate that there is some distant distant nugget of truth behind 'the guvments makin da frogs gay!!' that is actually an argument for better environmental protections

At the same time, Alex Jones has made a lot of women turn gay I'm sure and there's no one investigating that ...

[–] PopShark@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Thanks for the laugh

[–] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4586825/

Frogs and other amphibians are actually incredibly sensitive to all manner of chemicals. Heavy metals, trace pharmaceutical contamination in human wastewater... They basically breathe water through their very thin skin and have delicate tissues overall. They provide unique issues for conservationists because they are usually the first water related species to collapse.

Humans have a history of being able to tolerate years and years of direct contact with arsenic, lead and various toxins. Your basic oil paint set from before 1950's has a lifetimes worth of a modern person's regular exposure. Frogs are a poor indicator of how humans react to anything.

Plant based estrogens don't impact humans much. They do sheep... But only because they have four stomachs and can actually sort of process them. In humans they just slip through the system mostly untouched.

[–] PopShark@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Thank you very much for the link and your explanation.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm fond of this one in particular because "They're putting chemicals in the water that turn the frogs gay!" is both one of the craziest sounding things Alex Jones has said, one that was literally memed on for years as THE example of how nuts he is and also one that's technically true.

[–] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

No prob! Science and frog conservation is cool.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago

Thank you for answering them before I could get back to Lemmy.

[–] Distant_Foreground@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So sensitive in fact that a really common type of pregnancy test basically involved exposing a particular type of frog to human female urine. The frog being so sensitive to the presence of certain hormones would begin to ovulate if the urine sample was from a pregnant woman.

Really interesting but a bit of a shit lot in life for the frog!

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To be fair that's an improvement over the previous test since you could reuse the frogs while you had to kill the rabbit. Even older ones involved peeing on grain. We've known that there was something different about the urine of women when they are pregnant for a shockingly long time, but couldn't explain exactly what in any real detail until fairly recently.

[–] Distant_Foreground@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

I didn't know about the grain or rabbit tests. At least the rabbits got off the hook when the frogs presented themselves as a better option, I suppose.