this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Europe

8488 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
poVoq@slrpnk.net
0
'Online Safety Bill', the UK parliament undermined the privacy, security, and freedom of all internet users (www.eff.org)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by 0x815@feddit.de to c/europe@feddit.de
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The U.K. Parliament has passed the Online Safety Bill (OSB), which says it will make the U.K. “the safest place” in the world to be online. In reality, the OSB will lead to a much more censored, locked-down internet for British users. The bill could empower the government to undermine not just the privacy and security of U.K. residents, but internet users worldwide.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Weslee@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The big thing I'm mostly concerned about is this mysterious backdoor they are supposedly forcing tech providers to build into all devices - what exactly is this and what stops anyone from learning about it and exploiting it?

[–] UnknownQuantity@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's fairly simple: encrypted software developers will leave the UK, because no one would trust the security of their SW. I'm not sure if there is an exception for online banking, but perhaps this bill will stimulate the mattress industry and encourage return to the old ways of storing money.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tbf banking uses encryption for transactions exclusively between you and a bank. I don't think the law is "no end to end encryption at all"

I'm using signal no matter what dishi rishi tells me to do.

[–] 0x815@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

banking uses encryption for transactions exclusively between you and a bank. I don't think the law is "no end to end encryption at all"

They apply client-side scanning. Meaning the data gets scanned before it gets encrypted. This is like someone looking over your shoulder.

[–] 0x815@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even if there are exceptions for banking apps, would you trust them? What will private companies do to protect their trade secrets? What will children and other victims of sexual abuse do when they seek help and need a safe and private environment?

Edit for an addition:

UK mass interception laws violates human rights and the fight continues... [May 2021]

The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the UK government’s historical mass interception program violates the rights to privacy and freedom of expression.

[–] Gamey@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Australia did something similar ages ago, just for absolutely every peace of software even if a aingle employee lives from their but this one targeting encryption is bad too, it basically means every encryption software developer will leave the UK and proper encryption will be illegal to use.