this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Europe

8488 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tomassci@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That would homestly be nice. It's not about Eurovision, but about sending a message. If Russia gets banned from many activities for invading a sovereign country, Israel should get the same treatment for doing what is (at best) the same.

[–] SpookySnek@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Do you think that Russia would have been banned if Ukraine started the invasion by massacring hundreds of innocent civilians at a rave party in Russia, and took random tourists back home to Ukraine to rape them, and then spread videos of it all?

Now, Israel is all but innocent. But it is not 1:1 comparable

[–] arymandias@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Indeed it’s not a 1 to 1 comparison. One country is ordered by the ICJ to stop committing a potential genocide, and the other isn’t.

Edit: added the word β€˜potential’ to more accurately represent the ICJ ruling.

[–] SpookySnek@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

It has been ordered to PREVENT a hypothetical genocie, not to stop "committing a genocide".

Israel has done enough bad shit that you don't need to lie to prove your point

[–] arymandias@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Who is committing the hypothetical genocide?

Russia started a war of aggression so it makes sense they are banned from Eurovision till that has been resolved.

Israel is committing war crimes on a scale that is rare in modern history, so also a good reason to be banned.

And bringing up the oktober 7 attacks kinda sounds hollow after the response from Israel. Hammas killed 1.139 and Israel killed well over 25.000.

[–] SpookySnek@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Hamas committed a direct attack on civilians, without any military target in mind what-so-ever. Obviously this will be a serious crime against humanity in most people's eyes that makes it harder to count Israel's response as unwarranted, counting in their wrongdoings.

With the Rus-Ukr conflict, the same country is both the aggressor and the attacker that started the invasion. That makes it easier to see who the undoubtedly "bad guy" is.

[–] Syndic@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Hamas committed a direct attack on civilians, without any military target in mind what-so-ever.

About 1/4th of the Israelis deaths on October 7th were members of the military. The IDF by it's own reports has killed two civilians for every Hamas member, so 1/3rd of the deaths are military. They have killed at least 10k civilians in one month, so just a bit more than Russia did in the whole war but 10 times as much as Hamas managed! With those numbers let's keep in mind that Hamas are terrorists while the IDF is an organised army of a democratic state which claims to uphold human rights even in war times.

So yeah, neither side gets a medal from me for holding back against civilians.

[–] arymandias@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)
  1. Hamas is not taking part in Eurovision.
  2. A war crime is a war crime and a genocide is a genocide, no matter the justification.
  3. Calling Hammas the aggressor ignores quite a bit of complicated history.
[–] SpookySnek@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Hamas is the aggressor in this specific part of the almost 100 year old conflict, that resulted in the current circumstances.

What genocide are you referring to?

[–] arymandias@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

None in particular, I’m saying there is no excuse for genocide. So to determine if Israel is committing one, the actions of Hamas are irrelevant.

[–] Fiona@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

By that logic the specific part of the current genocide in Gaza Israel is the unambiguous aggressor.

Like: You cannot just ignore what came before. WTF?