this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
3 points (80.0% liked)

Answer Questions never been answered before (probably because they have never been asked)

54 readers
57 users here now

Ask anything you would consider too vague or too stupid. It is not supposed to be very refined or thought through, it can as well be a string of random symbols, just tell us how to read them. Consider it a very serious questions community, where questions most definitely are not serious, or the other way round. WE APPRECIATE ABSURDISM. WE APPRECIATE CREATIVITY. WE THRIVE ON ANSWERING GENUINE CURIOSITY!

These could be questions which you think a 5 year or 10 year old would ask, but you are not 5/10 year old and you don't have anybody to ask.

Rules:

founded 3 days ago
MODERATORS
 

(This has some grounds in reallity, so this very well is a post for brain storming). By not violating, i mean no creeping on others in their privatee places. Consider your selves owners of a factory which produces metallic objects which are transparent (properties similar to aluminium) what could be a product which could get you huge profits.

I would also like you to ignore the easiest option to make displays (for phones, laptops etc) which are much more tensile and durable.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Obvious answer is probably safety glass. If it outperformed current bullet resistant glass, it could make some people safer. Structural glass would also be good, so you could have better storm windows, greenhouses, etc. It also would be useful for making inspection easier in some cases. Pressurized vessels could have more visibility or more structural strength. Aquariums could be less bulky.

[–] sga@lemmings.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Aquariums would not get less bulky, but we would not have catastrophic failure

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Depends. If the metal is stronger than the glass it could be thinner, which is not that big of a deal in home aquariums, but aquariums, in the sense of a place one goes to look at fish, have huge, thick walls of glass to hold back the millions of gallons of water. If you could get that same strength with thinner material you could have a smaller footprint/more viewer space or a bigger tank with less reinforcement.

[–] sga@lemmings.world 1 points 32 minutes ago