Fallout New Vegas

768 readers

47 users here now

Posts must be about Fallout New Vegas. Memes from inferior Fallout Games will be flaired as such and will be shunned.

Follow Lemmy.World Standards!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Lukjam@lemmy.world

Console_Modder@sh.itjust.works

Console_Modder_LW@lemmy.world

238

every answer is a wrong answer (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 2 days ago by Console_Modder@sh.itjust.works to c/fnv@lemmy.world

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

giving it the same treatment that oblivion got, plus inviting the original devs to finish the things they wanted and make tweaks to the game, might be the single most redeeming thing bethesda could do.

[–] MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That would be amazing if they did that. I think they are busy with elder scrolls 6 and other shit though.

[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

i think they are busy with ~~elder scrolls 6~~ making another Elder Scrolls Online expansion to milk their MMORPG whales and ~~other shit~~ release skyrim again for the switch 2 though

FTFY

In seriousness I get the feeling ES6 met the same fate as HL3, Bethesda knows that skyrim was their thriller and they dont have the creative chops to ever top it. Whatever they put out will be lampooned hard and theyve got so much reliable re-release/remaster cataloug to print money with do why risk it. Now they treat ESO as an effective live service ES6. Your crazy if you think were getting ES6 before they remaster morrowind and daggerfall.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

well the oblivion remake did drop out of nowhere and was made by a separate studio, so there shouldn't be anything preventing them from doing it, beyond spite..