this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
251 points (90.1% liked)

memes

9680 readers
2488 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rozlif@feddit.uk 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It absolutely could. Not with the current diet but if there was a shift to less meat then we could substantially reduce the amount of land used in food production.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If we switched to a 100% plant based diet, there would be a strict decrease in the amount of available food. Animals eat things besides food that could have gone to humans. Land that could be used for growing crops is rarely used for raising livestock.

[–] Rozlif@feddit.uk 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Straight out not the case. lots of animals are on farmable land. Also animals eat lots of our crops eg 80% of the worlds soy. Here's one (of many possible ones) reference stating that we would only need 25% of the current agricultural land if the world went vegan. https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2022/01/28/if-everyone-were-vegan-only-a-quarter-of-current-farmland-would-be-needed

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

your economist article obviously relies on poore-nemecek 2018, which is a paper i wouldn't trust to tell me the CO2E of CO2

[–] Rozlif@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's lots of other sources. do you have a counter source?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

no. I'm attacking the methodology of poore-nemecek

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

animals eat lots of our crops eg 80% of the worlds soy.

the vast majority of the soy eaten by animals is the waste product from soybean oil production. that's a conservation of resources, and it's a good thing.

[–] Rozlif@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

do you have a reference for this?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Rozlif@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So your data set shows 76% used for animals and 4% for industry. That's very similar to the figures I referred to.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

you can see that the vast majority of the uses are from soy meal or soy cake. that's the industrial waste from making soybean oil. exactly as I said.