this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
94 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22352 readers
83 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Infernal_pizza@lemm.ee 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Is this just a meaningless label or are there actually consequences for this?

[–] uniquethrowagay 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'll try to summarize.

Germany's highest court can ban parties that want to dismantle democracy. But that process can only be initiated by the federal government, the federal parliament or a majority of the state parliaments. NOT by the court itself.

Before the election, there was a group of MPs spanning over almost all parties who advocated to initiate said process, but they couldn't form a majority. Other MPs and the government had argued to wait for the report that just now came out and confirmed AfD to be enemies of the democratic order.

So now they don't have any excuses, really. They are morally, but not legally, obligated to ask the court to ban AfD. Said court has signalled in the past that they have enough evidence and that they are eager to start. Whether or not it will happen is not clear, but it has never been more likely.

[–] Infernal_pizza@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago

That sounds promising!

[–] Schorsch 16 points 5 days ago

It means that the hurdles for the national secret service (Verfassungsschutz) to carry out measures of surveillance are lowered.