this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
10 points (91.7% liked)

Mass Brain Damage

85 readers
21 users here now

Mass Mind Brain Damage

Not just personal brain damage, not just one individual brain damage.

Brain damage of entire groups, mass mind brain damage. Mass man brain damage.

Reference:

  1. “The Galaxy Reconfigured or the Plight of Mass Man in an Individualist Society” - Marshall McLuhan, University of Toronto

  2. "Global Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind from the Big Bang to the 21st Century" - Howard Bloom, New York City

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

American conservatives tend to rate their mental health more positively than their liberal counterparts. Asking instead about overall mood eliminated the gap between liberals and conservatives. Conservatives may inflate their mental health ratings when asked, due to stigma surrounding the term.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RoundSparrow@lemm.ee 0 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

This study is spot on, and it’s hilarious.

I have found liberals are unable to resist absurd comedy surreal antics of conservatives. No matter the topic or concern (no matter the depth of serious), if conservatives use absurd surreal comedy and humor, liberals LOL and find it hilarious and hand over power to mass dehumanization leaderships.

 

I really wish we, NATO, could find a defense against surreal absurd "Surkov Governing" that has wrecked NATO

 

“In the twenty-first century the techniques of the political technologists have become centralized and systematized, coordinated out of the office of the presidential administration, where Surkov would sit behind a desk on which were phones bearing the names of all the “independent” party leaders, calling and directing them at any moment, day or night. The brilliance of this new type of authoritarianism is that instead of simply oppressing opposition, as had been the case with twentieth-century strains, it climbs inside all ideologies and movements, exploiting and rendering them absurd. One moment Surkov would fund civic forums and human rights NGOs, the next he would quietly support nationalist movements that accuse the NGOs of being tools of the West. With a flourish he sponsored lavish arts festivals for the most provocative modern artists in Moscow, then supported Orthodox fundamentalists, dressed all in black and carrying crosses, who in turn attacked the modern art exhibitions. The Kremlin’s idea is to own all forms of political discourse, to not let any independent movements develop outside of its walls. Its Moscow can feel like an oligarchy in the morning and a democracy in the afternoon, a monarchy for dinner and a totalitarian state by bedtime.” ― Peter Pomerantsev, Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible: The Surreal Heart of the New Russia, 2014