this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
657 points (98.2% liked)

Comic Strips

16284 readers
3099 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago (6 children)

why would a horse run amok just because the man is distracted?

or is it funny because the horse too got distracted by the writing?

i don't get it

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago

It’s just a silly anachronistic texting while driving joke. Of course a horse wouldn’t ride off a bridge in real life when someone is writing a letter. But a car would if someone is texting.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee 106 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think the joke is, it's the 17th century equivalent of texting and driving.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago (4 children)

But the 17th century self-driving function actually worked, though.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

So what you're saying is Elon needs to attach a horse to every Tesla to make them self-driving?

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Horses can decide to panic though

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 22 hours ago

Eh, the OS that drives autopilot could kernel panic.

[–] Sibshops@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] lividweasel@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

So is that horse and buggy, now

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I thought that was obvious, but yes absolutely.

[–] rasbora@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How did Charles even get the note from Jill? Did he purposely wait until he was driving to write his? How did he intend to send her his reply, was he perhaps driving over to her place to hand it over in person? Then why write it in the first place, and not just tell her!

I call shenanigans.

[–] Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 23 hours ago

Ohh, it's supposed to be Jill. So my approach that the horse was simply homophobic doesn't work anymore.

[–] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

This documentary stinks

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He had carrier pigeons in the carriage ..... Charles ain't dumb or poor.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Yeah they called Wi and Fi.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

It wouldn't, that's part of the joke

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Run amok or not, I don’t understand how it got so sideways on that narrow bridge.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's not because the driver is texting (distracted), but for some reason it got scared or confused, and because it lacked the control of the carriage driver, it took a wrong turn.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Horses aren’t stupid. Many a drunken cowboy made it home safely thanks to his trusty steed. But! Cartoon horses are stupid, much like cartoon humans.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They are not without intelligence, but they are still stupid compared to humans. They are also easily scared, and when they are they behave erratically.
But I changed the text to omit that part completely. Because somehow it seems to offend people?