this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
1367 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

69545 readers
4414 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Courtesy to Twitter user XdanielArt (date of publication: 8 June 2024)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

As much as I am loath to admit it, nothing comes close to feature parity with Photoshop. All the others are pretty replaceable, but if you are a professional who depends on a lot of the really advanced features you’re going to have a hard time replacing it. GiMP isn’t even close tbh. I admire the work they’re doing but they are a decade behind PS.

Good news is that is not most people.

[–] Nyticus@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But that's what makes GIMP special. There's some users who feel that Photoshop has stopped being relevant for some uses among those users. GIMP may be a decade behind but it could be swimming in what people remembered best about Photoshop before its enshittification and retains that kind of nature.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago
[–] shekau@lemmy.today 1 points 22 hours ago

What is the closest thing to PS in terms of features?

[–] Novocirab 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What's your opinion on Affinity (Designer/Photo)?

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If you’re getting down and dirty with color correction, object removal/replacement, and just depend on a lot of plug-in’s for your sauce, Affinity is lacking. Most people who use photoshop, however, do not need all that. Affinity is a solid program that definitely works for prosumers and below, as well as some professionals (depending on use case).

And I get it’s not popular to talk about but Adobe has fully embraced AI and some of their tools are legit. I don’t use it, but some folks really like firefly.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Affinity being prosumer puts it perfectly. If you only work on your own on smaller projects it does everything it needs to do but as soon as you work with other people professionally and have to share files? There‘s sadly no alternative for Adobe whatsoever. I am very happy with Affinity 2 but it‘s not a standard in the industry.

Personally I can not recommend using Adobe‘s AI features at the moment. I had to work on completely AI generated images for difficult customers and I assure you it was anything but pleasant. In the end it would‘ve been cheaper, faster and give far better results to use a stock image and edit it traditionally than being told to fix this and that with endless prompting.