this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
84 points (93.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

60382 readers
446 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

All I want to do is play Castlevania: Rondo of Blood. That's all I want to play right now. But, leave it to Konami to not ever bundle it in any of the Castlevania bundles they've released so far. And leave it to Konami to exclusively lock it to a small bundle that is exclusive to a previous gen console such as the PS4 with NO plans of ever reaching PC.

So what are my options now? Emulate of course, so I opted to pirate a copy of Dracula X Chronicles for the PSP after I read that you can play Rondo of Blood. But leave it to Konami to not make it that simple, because you have to complete a certain task in a certain stage at a certain part just to simply UNLOCK the fucking version!

My other option is to emulate the PC-Engine and go through yet another obstacle course just to get one fucking game to run.

This is what brings my blood to a boil, is when there had been perfect opportunities and chances for game devs to do the obvious. If there is a high demand for a game that you know people would want to fucking play, you fucking bundle it and fucking release it.

You do not have a damn argument to stand by against piracy, game devs, when you have to make it such a pain in the ass for people to spend time and effort just to play a game YOU didn't want to simply release!

How do you fuck up this badly, Konami? Technically speaking, Rondo of Blood is a 16-bit game, so there was no excuses to have not included it in the initial Castlevania Anniversary Collection. But of course, just nostalgia bait everyone with all of the other games they could've emulated several times as easier than it is just to get the ONE game you didn't want to bundle.

So fuck you.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cattywampas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I agree with your second statement, but not your first

Which is completely fair honestly. I don't expect everyone to feel the same or look at the issue the same way, even in the piracy community.

I still feel that if there is no easy way to play it legally, Konami or whichever company is relevant can go fuck themselves and I'll pirate the game instead.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imagine somebody dangling a cookie in front of your face, but refuses to give it to you unless you complete a set of certain unrelated and difficult tasks, despite you offering to just pay to take the cookie. Yet the cookie is still being dangled in your face.

This is that problem.

[–] cattywampas@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So I put on a mask to hide my identity and take the cookie if I want it, but without believing that I am entitled to it.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Bingo. But imagine they keep dangling that cookie in front of your face, taunting and teasing you even in the privacy of your own home, but will not let you purchase it on its own. In fact, in order to obtain said cookie, you must complete a bunch of unrelated tasks/purchase a bundle/subscription along with it. And then you only get the one cookie. This is how the video media world works.

The music industry figured it out already by letting you take as many cookies as you want, of all kinds, without limitations, for a flat monthly fee.

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.funami.tech 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In fairness, that comes with just not paying artists any money.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That... is a very fair point.

However, that could be resolved entirely by cutting out C-suite/shareholder profits and redirecting that money to the artists. But we all know that's never going to happen.

I'd love it if we had a music co-op sort of situation. But as you say, that doesn't make someone somewhere filthy rich.