this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
175 points (98.3% liked)

News

29156 readers
3947 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's because they're trying to distract from the memo:

For purposes of this guidance memorandum, an "Alien Enemy" under the Proclamation and 50 U.S.C. § 21 is a person who is: (1) fourteen years of age or older; (2) not a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States; (3) a citizen of Venezuela; and ( 4) a member of the hostile enemy Tren de Aragua, as determined by reference to Form AEA-21A, titled, "Alien Enemies Act: Alien Enemy Validation Guide," attached to this memorandum.

(2) Removal of Alien Enemies

All aliens who are determined to be Alien Enemies under the Proclamation and 50 U.S.C. § 21 shall be issued a.Notice and Warrant of Apprehension and Removal under the AEA and removed from the United States, except as provided in section (8) of this memorandum. In effectuating the removal of Alien Enemies, law enforcement officers and agents ("officers") must follow the procedures below.

A. Apprehension and Removal Procedures in Proactive Matters i. Step 1: Validation of Alien Enemy Status and Execution of Form AEA-21A At Step 1 of the proactive AEA apprehension and removal procedures, a line officer, or any other available officer ("line officer"), is responsible for determining whether an individual qualifies as an Alien Enemy. As outlined above, that requires determining that an individual is:

  • (1) at least fourteen years ofage;
  • (2) not a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States;
  • (3) a citizen of Venezuela; and
  • (4) a member ofTren de Aragua.

As outlined in that form, there may be instances where removal proceedings under the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA") would be more appropriate based upon a review of the facts of the case than removal under the AEA. Line officers should adhere to the instructions in Form AEA-21A, including consulting with their supervisor(s) and the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in making such a determination.

As much as practicable, officers should follow the proactive procedures above—and have an executed Warrant of Apprehension and Removal—before contacting an Alien Enemy,” the memo reads. “However, that will not always be realistic or effective in swiftly identifying and removing Alien Enemies.… An officer may encounter a suspected Alien Enemy in the natural course of the officer’s enforcement activity, such as when apprehending other validated members of Tren de Aragua. Given the dynamic nature of enforcement operations, officers in the field are authorized to apprehend aliens upon a reasonable belief that the alien meets all four requirements to be validated as an Alien Enemy. This authority includes entering an Alien Enemy’s residence to make an AEA apprehension where circumstances render it impracticable to first obtain a signed Notice and Warrant of Apprehension and Removal” (emphasis added).

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25915967-doj-march-14-memo-alien-enemies-act/#document/p1

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm glad they're actually following a judges orders for some reason, but yeah that's probably true.

Even if it's not meant to be a distraction, that is something people need to be very concerned about. My oh shit sensor has been going off frequently anyway, but especially since they first started talking about going after civil rights offices in DHS for getting in the way of immigration policy.

It should have been much more concerning that only 2 of the 3 offices being targeted actually deal with immigration. The other 3rd office is civil rights for any American dealing with DHS.

With this memo, they could just start entering people's homes and violating all kinds of rights under the premise of suspected housing of immigrants.

[–] Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They aren't really following orders, though. They're doing the same things but worse now. They are escalating.

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

True, following orders was not the best way to put it. Sadly I just meant instead of ignoring the judges decision or arresting the judge.