this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
66 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37585 readers
313 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sina@beehaw.org 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Mozilla, please refocus the resources to improve performance, or let FF disappear!

This whole thing with the private data collection is meaningless, if the browser is increasingly niche.

[–] dan@upvote.au 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What performance issues do you have with Fx? I use it daily and don't really feel like it's slower than Chrome.

[–] vii@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Unfortunately, Firefox is not as efficient as Chrome. On a battery powered devices this matters. Also it doesn't have a native dark mode for web content.
I'm this close to jumping the ship.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Were having radically different experiences. Firefox consumes way less power than chrome on all my machines

[–] derbis@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago
[–] Sina@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Chrome needs to be reinstalled every once in a while for some reason, or it will underperform.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago

It drains battery on fresh installs for me. I just don't bother. I don't really see the appeal of chrome tbh. Obviously I have to use it occasionally since google content locks shit and so do employers, but there's like... No real reason I'd use it as a daily driver. For my use cases and hardware its just plain worse

[–] theangriestbird@beehaw.org 10 points 1 month ago

Firefox is the only mobile browser I am aware of that allows extensions (including adblockers), and this let's the user add functionality like having dark mode everywhere, even on sites that normally wouldn't allow it.

[–] dan@upvote.au 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ahh, I see. I'm usually on desktop PCs and use solar power at home, so the efficiency is less of a concern.

AFAIK the "auto dark mode" in Chrome is experimental and doesn't work well on all sites. Have you tried Dark Reader on Firefox? More and more sites are adding native dark mode, too.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 21 points 1 month ago

Performance? FF is faster than chrome. What are you talking about.

[–] corbin@infosec.pub 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Firefox is faster than Chromium in many benchmarks, depending on the OS: https://arewefastyet.com/win10/benchmarks/overview?numDays=60

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 6 points 1 month ago

My experience is that Firefox often has problems on Google-owned properties. Either performance/responsiveness or functionality just not working. Why this would be is left as an exercise for the reader.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 month ago

Thank you for the hard numbers.