this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
963 points (97.9% liked)

Facepalm

3140 readers
15 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Irelephant@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Thats socialism, which is meant to lead eventually to communism. The end goal is to have no state.

If my understanding is correct, that is.

[โ€“] Zorque@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be fair ๐Ÿค“ since it's mostly theoretical, any definition of communism is going to be in flux as it has not achieved a shelf-stable real life application yet.

It's shelf stable in the same way as a clay pigeon.

[โ€“] ace_of_based@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yeah, Lenin even stated this was the end-goal.

[โ€“] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think it's possible for a state to give up power.

it's one of those things a lot of thought's been put into and commies themselves argue about. i feel it's great to conceptualize (and with it the differing definitions of "the state" as well) but i'm not a scholar anyway, this ain't the place, and it's moot since socialism needs to be achieved first anyway, after we beat this whole fascism thing. no point in worrying to much about it eh?