this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
85 points (97.8% liked)

Casual UK

2799 readers
249 users here now

Casual UK

A casual place for banter and anything that doesn't fit in anywhere else.

Have chat and a natter. Talk about anything and everything that's not political!

Keep it casual.

Rules

Other communities:

Here:

Elsewhere:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yep, I did my test in 2004 and it was quite new at the time…I seem to remember there being complaints about how it wasn’t based in reality.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 6 days ago

I think it made my driving worse. I remember after doing it, my instructor was asking why I was braking when I saw drivers roll into give way junctions ahead of me. Because in the hazard perception, they show you videos where people just go straight out!

[–] thisismyname@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was taught if you see a hazard click as soon as you see it, then click again two more times. The reason being that these things are programmed by humans and when the programmer deems the hazard to be a hazard and when you deem the hazard to be a hazard may be slightly differently timed. Bit of a shit system really but I don't really know how they could test it differently without a similar issue of tester and testee having different reaction times.

As a programmer I would have clicks within a given range of frames and these data points should be provided by the people facilitating the tests.