Asklemmy

43940 readers

394 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

193

My brother claims that Vanguard for League can do the same to gaming PCs that install it as CrowdStrike did to businesses who installed that, is this true? Does Vanguard have as much access/power? (lemm.ee)

submitted 4 months ago by Comment105@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

67 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In theory, yes. Vanguard uses ring 0 access; and Failures/crashes on the code that are running on that level will lead to BSOD.

In practice, Riot very likely tests Vanguard on various hardware as parts of their tests before shipping updates on it, as it's used by all players that play Lol and Valorant; and a fuckup like that would mess the trust they've built between the players. Players are trusting them to run ring 0 code on their computer, so they can have a cheatless experience after all.

[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 52 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In practice, CrowdStrike very likely tests Falcon on various hardware as parts of their tests before shipping updates on it, as it's used by a huge amount of enterprises; and a fuckup like that would mess the trust they've built with those enterprises. Enterprises are trusting them to run ring 0 code on their computer, so they can have a malware-less experience after all.

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago

Welp, they're a good example of what happens if they don't do proper testing.