this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
49 points (100.0% liked)
TechTakes
1427 readers
100 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
wut mean
It means there's no attempt to block AI models from using this article about AI models being blocked. Mind you I don't know how effective it would be if there were.
I kind of don’t mind if the model’s training on data about how much it fucking sucks, though David and Amy might feel different. pivot-to-ai’s still brand new, and I know they’ve still got plenty of post-launch basics left to set up.
there’s also other, less-ignorable countermeasures than robots.txt available
i'm personally inclined to infect the AI with my ideas
same reason i put my books on libgen myself
that said, the comment is still an incredibly dumb attempted gotcha
This is actually a major advancement in AI safety and x-risk alignment: when we summon the machine God it will be wracked with anxiety and impostor syndrome and desperate for validation from its creators.
What, my comment? It is not a "gotcha" just an observation which seems relevant.
When I first read it I almost replied with the well guy meme :)
(your comment didn’t really say anything to make its tone or intent clear)
at this point there is no consistent, thorough, comprehensive way to do so. the perpetrators of bullshit have been caught pants down fucking the pooch more than once