this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32576 readers
545 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

300,000 every week... is this really a feature not built into Java Script?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

is this really a feature not built into Java Script?

x % 2 == 0

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
(+x) % 2 == 0

If you forget for a second it's Javascript, the language will turn back and bite you.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I am not good friends with js, what did I miss?

Not a JS dev either but ===.

Not really sure what the (+x) is about

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

This evaluates to NaN for some reason:

'10' % 0

Since JS doesn't really differentiate strings from numbers, except on the places it does, it makes sense to make sure you are working with numbers.

[–] Oszilloraptor@feddit.de 0 points 8 months ago

the is_even package does not provide much worth indeed because it simply negates is_odd and thereby all its benefit.

It's dependency is_odd on the other hand provides at least some additional checks (it also checks if the value is a valid integer below the max int value)

And while I would indeed see uses for such methods (especially with the other checks, no simple oneliners) in some cases, especially in testing: This is stuff you write yourself, throw it in a e.g. NumberUtils class and everything is fine. You do never depend on an external library for that. The benefit (not spending a few seconds to write it) does not outweigh any of the drawbacks that come with external libraries.