Green Energy

2227 readers

16 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

poVoq@slrpnk.net

SteveKLord@slrpnk.net

226

Nuclear too slow to replace coal, and baseload “simply can’t compete” with wind and solar, AEMO boss says (reneweconomy.com.au)

submitted 4 months ago by phneutral to c/energy@slrpnk.net

128 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The head of the Australian energy market operator AEMO, Daniel Westerman, has rejected nuclear power as a way to replace Australia's ageing coal-fired power stations, arguing that it is too slow and too expensive. In addition, baseload power sources are not competitive in a grid dominated by wind and solar energy anyway.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] blimpkun@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Baltics powered by Finnish and Swedish nuclear.

[–] ticho@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well, that's a bald-faced lie. Maybe if we were only talking about Lithuania, which does import big chunk of its energy budget from Sweden, but Estonia and Latvia generate most of their energy on their own - and according to the linked article, plan to generate even more in near future.

[–] blimpkun@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Context is everyting. Here's some cold hard facts for you:

As of 00:00 on 19/07/2024:

| Country | From | % | MW | |--------------| -------- |

| ---- | | Estonia | Finland | 37% | 358 | | Latvia | Estonia | 33% | 325 | | Lithuania | Sweden | 40% | 733 |

% being the overall percentage of electricity consumption.

So >1GW imported from SE/FI out of ~4GW total in the Baltics is imported from countries with 40-50% nuclear baseload.

source https://electricitymaps.com/