science

14617 readers

214 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

m3t00@lemmy.world

Joleee@lemmy.world

laverabe@lemmy.world

DeadPand@midwest.social

Asexuality Is Finally Breaking Free from Medical Stigma (www.scientificamerican.com)

submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

New research on asexuality shows why it’s so important for doctors and therapists to distinguish between episodes of low libido and a consistent lack of sexual attraction

…

Over the past two decades psychological studies have shown that asexuality should be classified not as a disorder but as a stable sexual orientation akin to homosexuality or heterosexuality. Both cultural awareness and clinical medicine have been slow to catch on. It's only recently that academic researchers have begun to look at asexuality not as an indicator of health problems but as a legitimate, underexplored way of being human.

In biology, the word “asexual” typically gets used in reference to species that reproduce without sex, such as bacteria and aphids. But in some species that do require mating to have offspring, such as sheep and rodents, scientists have observed individuals that don't appear driven to engage in the act.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (9 children)

It's probably just an issue with oxytocin.

It does a lot of stuff, but what's important here is it's about social bonding. When it's not functioning correctly, you just never get lonely, you don't have the negatives from lack of social relationships including romantic.

Also, it's what make orgasms feel amazing. So without it, your getting rid of the two main positives for sexual relationships.

You might still enjoy the act of sex, you just don't get the huge addicting high at the end of it.

So it's at most a "sure, why not" thing compared to everyone else. And for some people, it's just not worth the hassle to varying degrees.

We also haven't identified any genetic markers, but there's likely some out there. And there's environmental issues when young that can effect it your whole life.

So we barely understand the "nurture" component and no idea about the "nature" side of things.

Edit:

Rather than keep responding to the same comments, please just scroll down for more information before replying.

[–] Oka@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Incorrect. It's not a disorder or dysfunction. It's a sexual attraction type just like gay or straight, and I would appreciate some respect, instead of this archaic "you're just sick"

As someone who is Asexual and been in relationships, I've still not had sexual attraction to my partners, and still had oxytocin highs.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Instead of getting offended and thinking it's a binary thing and everyone is either asexual or not:

Remember that any time someone talks about hormones or neurotransmitters, there is no "right" just "average".

And the most unique human on the planet would be the hypothetical person who is dead smack on the "average" for the 100s of different ones.

Pointing out what causes differences isn't the same as saying we need to get everyone in the average.

Hell, the entire article is about asexual people wanting to know the "why"....

Did you even read it yet?

[–] Nefara@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

On the contrary, the article listed in the OP is about people experiencing medical discrimination due to a lack of awareness that asexuality can be a valid orientation. The asexual people quoted in their personal anecdotes about their medical care were reporting that medical and psychiatric professionals continually misdiagnosed or gave erroneous treatment based on assumptions around what "healthy" sexual desire looks like.

Essentially, imagine someone posted an article talking about how medical professionals are finally recognizing being gay isn't a medical issue that needs to be "fixed", and then you respond saying what the physiological causes of being gay could be. You're getting kick back because it's at best pretty tone deaf, no matter whether it's backed up with evidence or not.

load more comments (7 replies)