this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
226 points (94.5% liked)

Green Energy

2227 readers
9 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
poVoq@slrpnk.net
SteveKLord@slrpnk.net
226
Nuclear too slow to replace coal, and baseload “simply can’t compete” with wind and solar, AEMO boss says (reneweconomy.com.au)
submitted 4 months ago by phneutral to c/energy@slrpnk.net
128 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The head of the Australian energy market operator AEMO, Daniel Westerman, has rejected nuclear power as a way to replace Australia's ageing coal-fired power stations, arguing that it is too slow and too expensive. In addition, baseload power sources are not competitive in a grid dominated by wind and solar energy anyway.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

  1. why did you specify in the west :)? You know why you did that, because nuclear plants do get built in 5 years elsewhere.

  2. emm, yes very much so. Like you said, they're are even a few suppliers who can do that. They just need enough orders for it to make sense.

  3. you should check that data again. Renewables are great, but some countries have better access than others. Right now Germany is building gas plants and burning coal and there is no end in sight for that.

  4. I might check that file later thanks, but what I'm taking about is just plain physics. You can not store enough energy today to make a big difference at any cost. And the cost is really high and can not be close to what a power plant can generate on the fly. It's just can't. Especially if you are taking lithium batteries.