this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
852 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

10271 readers
2788 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I love it but I do not understand

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 28 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"e", or Euler's number, is a constant used in maths because it has useful properties in logarithms and some other things. Basically just like pi except for logarithms instead of circles. Like pi, it's an infinitely long series of non-repeating digits. The crime you have witnessed in the post is a shitload of mathematical operations applying e to e in various ways in order to get (very close to) pi. Like saying "I'm going to make 14 using only 2" and then saying (2^2^2)-2, except instead of 2 and 14 you've got e and pi

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Formatting messed up (on my client at least.) It's 2^2^2, but it looks like (2^2)2 (without the parentheses, of course.)

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 3 points 1 month ago

That was the intention, yes. Thanks

[–] mogoh@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So it is not really approximating pi and there is no circle hiding?

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's approximating the value of the actual number pi, 3.14159 etc. It's not doing anything with pi after that

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

Donno if it's part of the joke but there is a beautiful equation:

e^iπ^+1=0

So once you allow yourself to use i and log and stuff, you get a nice and simple equation

[–] fossphi@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

They're also doing some shenanigans with the variable of integration. I bet it would look a lot more palatable if they were changed