this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
57 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
32096 readers
554 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's not shady, it's just a business model. The goal of the lead developers has always been to turn iodéOS into a self-sustaining project that they can afford to work full time on. That's why their headline feature, the iodé app, was partially closed source during its core development phase. Once they got it to a stage where it could be monetised, it went fully open source. At the same time, they notified all existing users on their forums and through the iodé News app of this change and offered a free lifetime premium subscription to everyone. There was no bait-and-switch, they looked after their community and were always honest about where the project was heading. The block lists locked behind the paywall are non-essential ones targeted more at parents - stuff like social media and porn. From a privacy standpoint, there is little difference between the free block list and the premium block list. I have devices running both and I notice zero difference in what's being let through. This is particularly true if you're using FOSS apps with zero tracking, which you realistically should be trying to do if you care about your privacy. Even in the unlikely scenario that there is some really pervasive tracker that gets through the free block list, you can just use a free service like NextDNS to block it.
As for security updates, it's true that iodéOS is slower than alternatives like DivestOS, GrapheneOS or CalyxOS. iodéOS's schedule is similar to LineageOS and /e/OS (also based on LineageOS), and usually runs about a month behind the aforementioned three. That is still a lot better than most stock manufacturer updates, by the way. However, I think whether this is an issue for you just depends on your personal circumstances. I don't see all six of these projects in direct competition with each other, but rather covering different areas. If you have a newer Pixel, then for sure DivestOS, GrapheneOS or CalyxOS make more sense but LineageOS, iodéOS and /e/OS all support a wider range of older devices that aren't supported anywhere else. If you're using, or want to use, one of those devices then it's no longer a question of update speed but rather whether you get updates at all. The reason why I started using iodéOS originally wasn't because it was outright better than GrapheneOS or CalyxOS, but because it supported my existing phone.