this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
66 points (94.6% liked)
Gaming
2432 readers
237 users here now
The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community
For news, discussions and memes!
Community Rules
This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:
You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.
What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:
- Respectful Communication: We strive for positive, constructive dialogue and encourage all members to engage with one another in a courteous and understanding manner.
- Inclusivity: Embracing diversity is at the core of our community. We welcome members from all walks of life and expect interactions to be conducted without discrimination.
- Privacy: Your privacy is paramount. Please respect the privacy of others just as you expect yours to be treated. Personal information should never be shared without consent.
- Integrity: We believe in the integrity of speech and action. As such, honesty is expected, and deceptive practices are strictly prohibited.
- Collaboration: Whether you're here to learn, teach, or simply engage in discussion, collaboration is key. Support your fellow members and contribute positively to shared learning and growth.
If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I feel like you're giving them entirely too much credit here. The things in your list are in my opinion either not that outstanding, or they haven't actually accomplished them yet:
Already discussed in a comment below, but this is just demonstrably not true. Their development costs so far are the second highest of all time. Maybe there were some periods where money was tight, but that's pretty irrelevant to me. More relevant is what they've delivered with all that money.
I'm not 100% sure what this even means. Like, It's pretty common for games to make their own mechanics, if you're not Ubisoft. This is not that special.
Swapping engines sure is tough to do, but this is generally not a good sign. The only reasons to change engines partway through is either you're in development so long that the engine is too outdated to deliver an acceptable game, or the scope of the game has changed so much the engine is no longer suitable. I don't know which one applies here, but either way it's just a ton of wasted work.
I mean, good I guess but that's sort of the expected standard for early access? Not what I'd call outstanding
"Working on" is doing an awful lot of lifting in that sentence. So they haven't actually accomplished this thing yet? Is the asteroid thing you're describing already in the game? I'm also really sceptical of "an entire galaxy." How big is the galaxy currently? A real life galaxy is 100 billion stars. They're not going to have a 100 billion stars, right?
Outstanding accomplishment. You can download and play the game, wow. I sure would hope so after all these years.
Now, don't get me wrong, I don't mean to shit on Star Citizen. If you paid money and you're having fun playing it and feel you're getting your money's worth, who am I to object?
Where I do object is, fans of the game seemingly often evaluate the game based on the promises the development team makes, rather than what they have actually delivered. What the team promises is awesomely impressive. What the game currently offers is... not that.
Excellent points! Just want to iterate, I'm not a mega fan or anything close. Just saw this thread was a "SC scam" circle-jerk of sorts, and wanted to provide some counter-info from someone who has played, and in the past did a fair amount of reading and watching their more technical posts.
When I say mechanics from scratch, I mean there is no industry standard they can copy, ex: Like true zero 0g in space piloting, with 0 aerodynamics, then flying down to a planet where those start to exist. They had a blog post about having to overcome that.
As far as the economy goes, years ago they had a more technical video where their top guy doing the (architecture, engineering?) was explaining and showing live examples of a very basic version working. Blew my mind and made me appreciate their goal.
Engine swap was basically an upgrade they realized they would need for the scope of the game. IIRC, they went from CryEngine to Lumberyard, which is a custom CryEngine reworked to be an excellent match specifically for Amazon's AWS from what I can tell.
I'm just using the word galaxy from a sci-fi point of view. Not a literal galaxy size with an unfathomable amount of stars, planets, etc.
4 years ago the default answer for why it's taking so long is always they have to create multiple tools and programs to be able to create what they want at the scale they want. Like not every planet can be hand crafted, they need to create a program that is able to create 100s of planets and have them be unique, and fast.
I personally view all their promises and hype from the view of coming from a potential con-man, whose vision is everything I'd ever want in what is IMO, going to be a big MMO. And I'm personally pleasently surprised with what they've created so far, including looks into the tools they're making. As of 4 years ago when I last looked.
I feel like trying to say that they are objectively a scam is dishonest. If someone is curious, check it out on Twitch, go through their blogs and YouTubes of them showing off their work in progress tools. Decide if you wanna risk $40 or not. Which I'd argue is a fair amount considering how much content there is now, that I've enjoyed in the past. It's not an excuse, but Early Access gaves have launched with far less, and much less stable or optimized.