this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
542 points (98.0% liked)

Videos

14065 readers
187 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article.
  4. Don't be a jerk
  5. No advertising
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Glowstick@lemmy.world 81 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Make them better looking and push-button retractable from inside, and people will want them.

EDIT

At 16:40 he suggests high tech awnings that automatically unfurl and retract to provide the ideal amount of shade on each day of the year. Seems like a nearly perfect solution to me

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I haven't watched the video yet, but vernacular architecture back in the day commonly set shading elements like awnings at the right height/angle such that during midday in the winter, sunlight would still directly go through windows and hit interior floors and walls. During summer, the angle of the sun would be high enough that direct sunlight could not reach windows.

You can get pretty far with just those passive designs. There are tools to help you find the dimensions you'd need based on where you live without having to do any calculations yourself.

[–] Glowstick@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

While that may be true, it doesn't make people want them any more than they currently do. People want to have their full window view available whenever they want it. This means it needs to be retractable and extendable at the push of a button. And once you have that, it's easy and helpful for it to also be automated

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Shade doesn't have to block any of the view. Many very modern houses with giant windows use these principles.

[–] Glowstick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

View includes being able to see the sky. These permanently block some of the view of the sky.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Speak for yourself, I'd rather not have the sun baking me. We don't have central A/C where I live and we're not allowed awnings of any kind. So it's super heavy curtains. I'd jump for any kind of awnings in a second.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People want to have their full window view available whenever they want it.

damn, too bad you can't just like, go outside, or something.

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People get shot for doing that these days

you should try going outside. Might reduce your chances of getting shot from going outside.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's expensive. I got quoted 10k for 4 windows

[–] TheIllustrativeMan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

This is the real reason they disappeared - awnings cost money and don't increase square footage. That's also why every modern building is a boring box.

We didn't forget about them, it's still covered in architecture school. You can even make them look really cool. But they cost money, and that's a hard barrier to cross.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

You can buy them off the shelf and then put them up yourself. Of course then you have to calculate the amount of pain it'll be to put them up and the fact that it'll never be as good as getting it done by professional. Plus in my case they'll be a lot less blood involved.

10 grand does seem like a lot of money though. How large are your windows?

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Better quality of living (in the long run even living longer) and less energy consumption on the AC may change that calculation.