this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
42 points (93.8% liked)

Privacy

31900 readers
489 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It seems like the main benefit of such frontends is the lack of trackers and fingerprinting, but what if the browser, like Firefox, already did that with UBlock Origin and fingerprinting protection?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ssm@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
  1. Adblockers aren't perfect, and unless you're running an ultra-paranoid uMatrix setup, you're likely running some scripts you don't want to.
  2. Cookies, even """necessary""" first party ones, can be used for tracking.
  3. Unless you use reddit's old. subdomain (which they might kill at any moment), reddit's and youtube's webclients are bloated beyond belief.
  4. Browsers have far more ways to fingerprint you than some api calls or webscraping over tcp on a 3rd party client; especially with javascript enabled.
  5. Webclients are often ugly and painful to use.
  6. You can completely avoid the algorithm.
  7. Due to the relative obscurity, you can avoid the arms race between projects like uBlock and social media platforms. youtube-dl got some legal flak, but yt-dlp is continuing its legacy.