this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3055 readers
105 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

There was an interesting discussion on Radio 4 the other day that suggested you could release a lot more female prisoners because they tended to not be in for violent or sexual crimes. It would make less tabloid headlines and clear a prison or two.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Of course, just releasing prisoners based on crime and & how much of the assigned sentence is served. Has exactly the same effect. Without any ability to accuse of prejudice.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They weren't suggesting just releasing women as that would be an issue.

Of course, if you are releasing people for offences were drink, drugs or mental health may have contributed, then you need a better support mechanism or they'll boomerang straight back inside. Another reason a holistic approach is needed. It's why cutting the money going to social work, mental health services, etc, etc is not a saving.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago

It's not just that kind of support. Just releasing people isn't good either. For one thing, they need places to live, and help finding work, etc.

I hope this is going to happen along side a bunch of resources going to the services which support people after release. Otherwise this is going to go very wrong as you suggest.

[–] Five@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if publishing leaked US military helicopter footage and violating the UK Bail Act would have been crimes worthy of release.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Like that was ever up to us to decide?

[–] Five@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago

True, that one's on Obama, Trump, and Biden. Still would have been super awkward to release a bunch but keep the journalist.

I bet they're not releasing Toby Shone or the crew charged with first time riot offenses though.