this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
160 points (80.1% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6083 readers
421 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't understand this weird American obsession with flag. I was looking at some photos of Trump's rallies. Flags everywhere - on shirts, hats, glasses etc. And this bizarre cult of the flag - "it cannot touch the ground" etc.

At the end of the day the flag is just a piece of cloth. If you worship any flag or take offense to any flag, you need to get a life.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No need to be sorry :)

Achievements of people from the past?

[...]

Is it being proud of your impact on others, through your everyday interactions?

Definitely more the latter rather than the former. There is a great deal of trust in Danish society. There is a shared understanding, community and culture that Danes are proudly part of - proud because we believe it is a good culture (and I think the happiness scores that get released every so often for different countries speak for themselves).

But most people in a country - even a small one (more like Andorra than Denmark) - are not meaningfully affected by you.

I don't see it like that. Yes, someone living in the other part of Denmark doesn't directly affect me of course. But I do think they meaningfully affect me, even if in a small part. I think Denmark is still small enough that it matters that someone in the big city in the other part of the country is still connected to me by culture and a shared "zeitgeist", if that makes sense.

Anyways, I hope you can maybe understand that for some people, there can be such a thing as being proud of your country. You don't have to understand fully though, I understand it can be hard coming from another culture (also it's not like I speak for all Danes obviously and some would certainly disagree with what I'm saying here). I would encourage you to try visiting Denmark one day and maybe see for yourself :)

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Definitely more the latter [...] countries speak for themselves).

What you talk about, concerning "trust in the Danish society", is clearly a cultural matter. And, as I highlighted in the other comment, cultures neither coincide with countries, nor they should.

I don’t see it like that. Yes, someone living in the other part of Denmark doesn’t directly affect me of course. But I do think they meaningfully affect me, even if in a small part.

We could spend weeks discussing what to "meaningfully affect someone else" entails, but that would be pushing a boundary line back and forth between points of a gradient, to force a conclusion for either side. (That's always a problem when trying to handle quantitative matters with qualitative labels.)

However: no matter where you put that line, it won't coincide with the country, because some people from other countries affect you more than some people from the same country as you. Perhaps because they're shaping what you think, perhaps because they have political power (even over other countries than yours), so goes on. (The opposite is also true - you're likely affecting far some people from other countries than some other people from within your country.)

Anyways, I hope you can maybe understand that for some people, there can be such a thing as being proud of your country.

If I may be honest, the argumentation that you're using is mostly the same as I've seen coming from other people. It is not a matter of "lack of understanding", but disagreement.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

cultures neither coincide with countries

I think that's very reductionist. Countries clearly have a large influence on culture and culture often forms around countries as people in a country share borders and law and politics and all that.

Anyways, we can agree to disagree if you insist. I do think you're being slightly closed-minded in this case though, but it's not a big deal.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

Countries clearly have a large influence on culture

To influence is not the same as to dictate. And the ways that a country influences culture of its citizens are, most of the time, shitty - cue to the linked example of Vergonha. (It's actually a mild example, when you remember that massacres are a damn efficient way to have "a large influence on culture".)

And, sure, there are even milder versions of that. And considerably less efficient.

culture often forms around countries as people in a country share borders and law and politics and all that.

And it forms also across the borders too, to such an extent that "we have the same head of state" and "we're subjected to the same laws" become just a drop in an ocean. Food gets shared, people learn each other's languages (or make a contact language in the spot, that eventually is passed to their children), fashion and architectural trends get mimicked... even the laws get mimicked. Or they simply are born in a place and move 5km next door, and that happens to be the other country already.

Of course, as long as the countries aren't artificially trying to prevent that from happening.

Anyways, we can agree to disagree if you insist. I do think you’re being slightly closed-minded in this case though, but it’s not a big deal.

I don't think that I'm being closed-minded, but that I'm taking more things into account than you are.