this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
87 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

58009 readers
2949 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/17926125

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] gibmiser@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Current tech is 200 to 250 so a substantial reduction in battery weight, 50% or 60%

[โ€“] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Huge leap forward if the process is in the same ballpark expense wise. Being able to reduce a cars battery by 50% would reduce the prices by at least 5k, and likely have longer range because of the reduced weight.

Edit : still very experimental. Battery only retains that energy density for 300 charges. This is an improvement from an earlier 50 cycles, but not really viable either.