this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
351 points (84.8% liked)

linuxmemes

20688 readers
1115 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
351
Sorry, y'all. (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
 

I blame rtxn@lemmy.world's comment for giving me this idea.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That is not ok either. Children adult sexual or romantic relationships are not ok because of the power dynamic. Both of legal rights and emotional and mental maturities.

[–] absentbird@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Weird how none of these arguments show up on images of hetero teen romance.

[–] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Doesnt matter if theyre gay/straight, this is very obviously sexualizing minors. The skirts blowing up is a dead giveaway.

[–] absentbird@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Good point, with hetero teen romance the guy usually isn't even wearing a skirt.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

This isn't even an image of lesbian teen romance tbh. Its penned for the viewers interest instead of candid scene of two kids in love

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The girls in the picture appear to be minors though? I never suggested an age difference??? Wtf...

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

The perspective of the image is voyeuristic. The person criticing the trend is talking about that issue.