this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
103 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

1163 readers
357 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Congress accused advertisers group of colluding to tank X's revenue.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 54 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Looked at from another angle, Musk wants courts/government telling businesses that they’re required to spend their money to support other businesses - regardless of how those businesses are run, or the beliefs touted by their outspoken executives.

This sounds like an absolute nightmare for republicans and libertarians. I almost hope it succeeds. It’s not like I’ve got a horse in this race.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It’s not like I’ve got a horse in this race.

Same, except there's that whole "forward the cost to the consumer" thing that business tends to do. Especially when such rules apply to everyone, so there's no competitive disadvantage in doing so.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago

Businesses will just redirect some of their existing advertising budget, which we’re already paying for anyway. The net cost to the consumer will remain the same.