this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
175 points (91.5% liked)

World News

38255 readers
2241 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

He said the doctors’ accounts of tiny entry wounds are also consistent with glide bombs and tank rounds fitted with fragmentation sleeves such as the M329 APAM shell, which is designed to penetrate buildings, and the M339 round which its manufacturer, Elbit Systems of Haifa, describes as “highly lethal against dismounted infantry”.

Of course the israeli in-house stuff weapons are war crimes^2^

Biden will ask israel to investigate it and send them more bombs

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

M329 is advertised as MP, but it lacks forward shaped charge so it's not, because it is not suited to destroy anything with more than ornamental armour, by design. instead, it's just a lot of pre-formed fragmentation in a cylindrical box. by itself, standard feature of modern weapons, but overall it's not a weapon designed to fight a peer adversary

“The issue comes with how these small munitions are being employed,” said Ball. “Even a relatively small munition employed in a crowded space, especially a space with little to no protection against fragmentation, such as a refugee camp with tents, can lead to significant deaths and injuries.”

this is the warcrimey part, i thought that it goes without saying

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How is this different from any grenade? Even the cheapest RG-42 grenades have pre formed fragmentation.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

RG-42 is a ww2 era design that relies on natural fragmentation. it has no PFF, it has rolled steel sheet fragmentation liner with no indentations or anything that would aid in separation of fragments. that thing has pre-cut steel cubes, Spike uses tungsten cubes, steel balls or cylinders (soviet designs) are often used too. natural fragmentation results in wide range of fragment sizes, with either too small (and braking on air, causing no significan injury) or too big (produced in small number and missing intended fragment). RG-42 and to lesser degree RGD-5 fragments are just pieces of steel sheet, so few tens of meters away it's just angry glitter, because it brakes on air rapidly due to nonaerodynamic shape

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

https://youtu.be/HCoUTCBALZI?t=130 shows indentations for a RG-42.

But anyways the point is fragmentation munitions are commonplace.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

i thought that RG-42 was smooth inside, and i still think that RGD-5 is

anyway, these are still not pre-formed fragments, because some of these grooves will not cause fragments to separate

it's not that different from any other weapon that throws around fragments, just that PFF covers highest area or whatever metric you choose per kilogram of weapon. this works only if you don't care too hard about cost and can ignore some engineering constraints (such as acceleration survivable by weapon etc)

e: you can see in that video at 5:50 how a few of these squared remained unseparated as a single fragment

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

My point is that new weapons are better than old ones but they’re still fulfilling the same intention. It’s not like the inventor of the old grenades wouldn’t jump at the chance to increase the lethality of their creations.

The GMLRS used in Ukraine are also optimized for fragmentation and nobody is complaining because they’re fired at military targets.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)