this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
371 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

60186 readers
1648 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] naught101@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't that just say that AI will never be cheap? You can still brute force it, which is more or less how back propagation works.

I don't think "intelligence" needs to have a perfect "solution", it just needs to do things well enough to be useful. Which is how human intelligence developed, evolutionarily - it's absolutely not optimal.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can still brute force it, which is more or less how back propagation works.

Intractable problems of that scale can't be brute forced because the brute force solution can't be run within the time scale of the universe, using the resources of the universe. If we're talking about maintaining all the computing power of humanity towards a solution and hoping to solve it before the sun expands to cover the earth in about 7.5 billion years, then it's not a real solution.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, maybe you're right. I don't known where the threshold is.

I wonder if the current computational feasibility will cap out improvment of current generation LLMs soon?