this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
49 points (98.0% liked)

SneerClub

963 readers
16 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
self@awful.systems
blakestacey@awful.systems
dgerard@awful.systems
49
That tracing woodgrains peice on David Gerard is out (www.tracingwoodgrains.com)
submitted 2 months ago by Starseeder@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems
245 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I got as far as "he says crypto is bad but also didn't make any money in crypto!" before I couldn't go any farther. Up until that point the author was at least doing a pretty competent job of using negative space (i.e. not engaging with the specific issues of racism, cult of personality, etc.) and using sufficiently boring prose to avoid seeming completely insane.

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Attempt 2 got all the way to the part about Scott before I had to come up for air.

  • The defense of Wikipedia's preference for policy over basic human decency in the Chelsea Manning name change was once again left entirely implicit.

  • This is probably for the best because otherwise David's insistence on reliable sources over letting LWers do their own hagiography on Wikipedia's letterhead is much harder to criticize.

  • Is Neoreaction: a Basilisk a bit of a woozle/citogenesis? Maybe? But are we going to argue about the central factual claims it makes? Nope. There's no attempt to dispute the overlap between NRX and Ratdom, just an un-argued assumption that nobody should care enough to put it in their Wikipedia article. I swear, you build ten thousand bridges and nobody cares but you repeatedly speak favorably of actual fascist's attitudes on race science on your large and influential platform and everyone loses their minds.

Edit because man who can remember how to do formatting?

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 12 points 2 months ago

There’s no attempt to dispute the overlap between NRX and Ratdom, just an un-argued assumption that nobody should care enough to put it in their Wikipedia article.

(ahem) The correct term is a prior.

:-P