Technology

60133 readers

2488 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

365

Leaked Documents Show OpenAI Has a Very Clear Definition of ‘AGI’ (gizmodo.com)

submitted 2 days ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world

155 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

there is a clear economical value in what they produce

There is clear economic value in chains of bullshit that may or may not ever have a correct answer?

[–] suy@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

OpenAI doesn't produce LLMs only. People are gonna be paying for stuff like Sora or DallE. And people are also paying for LLMs (e.g. Copilot, or whatever advanced stuff OpenAI offers in their paid plan).

How many, and how much? I don't know, and I am not sure it can ever be profitable, but just reducing it to "chains of bullshit" to justify that it has no value to the masses seems insincere to me. ChatGPT gained a lot of users in record time, and we know is used a lot (often more than it should, of course). Someone is clearly seeing value in it, and it doesn't matter if you and I disagree with them on that value.

I still facepalm when I see so many people paying for fucking Twitter blue, but the fact is that they are paying.