this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
362 points (97.4% liked)

homeassistant

12285 readers
35 users here now

Home Assistant is open source home automation that puts local control and privacy first. Powered by a worldwide community of tinkerers and DIY enthusiasts. Perfect to run on a Raspberry Pi or a local server. Available for free at home-assistant.io

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey all,

A couple of weeks ago I posted my 3D printable pegboard organizers, and today I’m releasing the Only Sensor line of home automation sensors.

Fully free and open, complete with wiring diagrams, cases, component bill of materials, and instructions for assembly.

You source and build them yourself, with acquisition costs ranging from $2-$35 to build, and options for:

  • mmWave presence
  • PIR motion detection
  • Temperature
  • Humidity
  • LUX
  • PM <10µm AQI
  • PM <2.5µm AQI
  • PM <1µm AQI
  • NOX
  • VOC

All integrate with Home Assistant via ESPHome.

All the details can be found at: https://nowsci.com/only-sensor/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TDCN@feddit.dk 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Those dht11 sensors are garbage tho. Best case they are wildly off on their humidity sensor. Worst case they keep breaking and shows nonsense readings. I would recommend bme280 sensor instead. If you read about them you might see people complain that they are reading too high temperatures, but in my experience its because they are misconfigured. Default settings have a very high sampling rate of multiple samples per second that heats up the sensor a tiny bit giving you the offset. Lowering the sampling rate or turn the sensor off completely in between readings gives really precise measurements on both temperatures and humidity.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

+1 on BME280 vs the DHT. I don't know why the DHT are so expensive, they're pretty bad.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yea I've considered recommending thr DHT22 instead, but I was trying to keep costs as low as possible, and honestly I've had pretty good results thus far (calibrating with other systems, anyway).

[–] TDCN@feddit.dk 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bme280 is actually just as cheap if not cheaper than the dht sensors. But its a fair point trying to keep the cost down. I definitely like that philosophy, but if the quality suffers too much it's just not worth the trouble. Keep up the good work. 😎

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 6 points 2 days ago

Oh good to know, will investigate!