this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
90 points (92.5% liked)

science

14307 readers
74 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
m3t00@lemmy.world
Joleee@lemmy.world
laverabe@lemmy.world
DeadPand@midwest.social
90
Language Is a Tool for Communication, Not for Thought, MIT Researchers Argue (www.technologynetworks.com)
submitted 2 months ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

And it’s not unreasonable to expect that well-spoken, articulate individuals are also clear thinkers.

Yeah no. Aren't there some workshops for CEO's and managers & co. who try to learn the creative thinking of neurodiverses? Because we usually think without words, we "translate" afterwards.
Thinking is actually more efficient without language. I don't know of any neurotypicals who think about deep physics for fun.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

I like both n9n verbal thought for speed, verbal for creativity.

Sometimes just saying something out loud, forcing through the social groqs creates a new outlook on something

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How do you know whether or not physicists are neurotypical?

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The reverse. I know that most neurodiverse are in MINT.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

The reverse of what? I asked how you know whether or not they are.

How do you know?