this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
517 points (98.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21596 readers
519 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

    for music what I use is AIMP. I only hope it can work with wine because I don't want to run a VM for it

    So unless your usecase requires 2TB+, SSDs are a better choice. Or if it needs 1TB+ and also has immensely high rewrite rates.

    that's good to know, it'll keep this in mind. thanks!

    I have multiple complete disk images of various defunct installs, archived on my nas. That is a prime example for stuff to put into network storage. Even if you use them, loading them up would be comparable in speed to doing it off of an HDD.

    does this also stand for when shares are done with SMB? I'm mostly worried about random access there being worse than with a local HDD

    [–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

    Smb should be fine. I used it for years on my primary systems (I moved to sshfs when I migrated to linux finally), and it wasn't ever noticeably less performant than local disks.
    Compared to local ntfs partitions anyway, ntfs itself isn't all that fast in file operations either.

    If you are looking at snapshots or media, that is all highly sequential and low file operations anyway. Something like gaming off of a nas via smb does also work, but I think you notice the lag smb has. It might also be iops limitations there.

    Large filesizes and highly random fast low-latency reads is a very rare combination to see. I'd think swap files, game assets, browser cache (usually not that large to be fair).

    For anything with fewer files and larger changes it always ran at over 100MiB/s for me until I exhausted the disk caches, so essentially the theoretical max accounting for protocol losses.

    for music what I use is AIMP. I only hope it can work with wine because I don't want to run a VM for it

    I use that on android. Never knew there were desktop versions, odd that it supports android but not other linux.
    Wine is very reliable now, it will almost certainly work out of the box.
    Otherwise there are also projects to run android apps on linux, though no doubt at much more effort and lower chance of success than wine.