Not The Onion

12180 readers

864 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

Republican defends child marriage: I'm "pro-choice" (www.newsweek.com)

submitted 6 months ago by Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/15199291

Republican defends child marriage: I'm "pro-choice"

A New Hampshire Republican lawmaker who has been under fire for defending child marriage has lashed out at his "haters" while insisting that his stance is "pro-choice."

State Representative Jess Edwards inspired outrage last week after describing underage teenage girls as "ripe" and "fertile" while arguing against a bill to raise the age of marriage in the Granite State from 16 to 18. The bill passed by a vote of 192-174 despite objections from Edwards and others.

…

Edwards described critics of his underage marriage stance as "an army of control freaks that want to entice a pregnant woman into an abortion rather than allow a marriage" in a Facebook post on Monday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Reason no * I'm glad I don't live in either the US or Australia.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The person he replied to is Australian, though, so I don't get the downvotes. Seems like a pretty appropriate reply to me.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, it's simple whataboutism.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Is it?

[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There are issues in America

Whatabout Australia?

Yes.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The opposite is true as well, but don't let nuance stop your victory dance.

[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"Reason x as to why y" is the same amount of whataboutism as the comment you replied to. Ie. You're being obtuse and using whataboutism to deflect legitimate criticism.

[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Okay, you're coming in a little hot there. I have no idea what you're talking about. I'm not deflecting anything. I'm saying that pointing out that there are issues in Australia does not absolve the fact that there are issues in the US. I'm literally only pointing out that it is, in fact, whataboutism. That's it. I haven't even touched on the issues themselves, so whatever persona you've painted on me and are clearly so passionate about is in your head only.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

Comment you replied to : Australia better than USA because x = whataboutism

Reversed comment : Australia not better or worse than USA because x = same amount of whataboutism.

You're painting all whataboutism as a negative when in reality that's not always the case and in fact sometimes like this case it is indeed legit criticism.