this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
1192 points (99.3% liked)

People Twitter

5425 readers
2396 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Fair, I suppose I'm just far more ok with supporting vigilante murder and don't see the loss of every life as a real loss. But if that's what you're going for, fair.

[โ€“] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I'm of two minds. Half the time I'm feeling what Tolkien taught - "many that live deserve death, and many that die deserve life. Will you give it to them?" As I cannot bring the dead back to life, I should not be so quick to endorse the taking of life.

The other half of the time I'm ready to start a crowd funding campaign to erect a giant bronze statue of Luigi.

The latter attitude I tend to reserve for flippant comments and posts. I've been on a kick lately about suggesting we chain CEOs to boulders and throw them into the Sea. But when I actually sit down and write something more long form, I tend to take the former approach. Also, I wanted to have something that people could reference as an actual calculation for the real magnitude of Thompson's crimes. I felt not openly condoning murder was better for that purpose. But I still wanted to have a strong moral component, so I took the approach of "all y'all are goin' to Hell for this."