Games

16651 readers

718 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

Apex Legends gets the ol' Steam review bomb treatment. The free-to-play shooter is facing blowback from its new cash-only battle pass policy. (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 3 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

"One single aspect", especially cash grubbing, completely and absolutely removes any capacity to enjoy the game from most users.

They're not recommending that game because of that "one aspect" because that "one aspect" makes the game unplayable as far as they're concerned.

Ignoring massive deal breaking flaws to try to do some average of individual features is a far less honest or accurate review. A single issue, if it's big enough, can change a game from the best thing anyone's ever made into a complete and utter pile of shit. Games are not a sum of parts.

[–] imecth@fedia.io -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This isn't massive flaws that suddenly appeared overnight, or the straw that broke the camel's back, it's purely because they want to get back at the developer. So yes, I think "review bombing" is accurate.

Don't get me wrong, i dislike enshittification as much as the next guy; but I don't think a game's review should be about what the devs posted on twitter yesterday.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It absolutely is a massive flaw that fundamentally changes their ability to enjoy the game.

They changed the amount of cash they demand after the fact to take advantage of people addicted. Not giving it a negative review for such open abuse would be the unethical behavior. You have an obligation to do so. The ethics of monetization is what defines free to play games.