this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
933 points (99.6% liked)

People Twitter

5380 readers
370 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] obre@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Props to Klippenstein, he's consistently been an exemplar* of good journalism

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Kenny Klipps does great work, one of the very few last bastions of actual journalism remaining in America.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Props to Klippenstein, he's consistently been an examlar of good journalism

When David Grusch testified that UFOs are real, Klippenstein made a point of exposing that Grusch had past issues with PTSD and alcoholism stemming from his service.

Examlar indeed.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That seems relevant to me, a disinterested observer. 🤷‍♂️

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah, it really makes anything he does invalid. The same as it would for you or I.

Maybe I should also clarify: fuck business ghouls. I’m not here to defend health insurance.

[–] obre@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's an important factor to consider when thinking about the credibility of his claims. That's what journalism is supposed to do, give people the facts. I get that discussing people's medical history and psychological condition is a sensitive subject, but when someone's making public claims and accusations in front of congress about delusional stuff like "non-human spacecraft" and their dead pilots that level of scrutiny is justified.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

Why do you assume it’s delusional?

[–] KnightontheSun@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

lol. You guys had me looking up "examlar" thinking I was going to learn a new word.

My hopes were dashed as I've discovered that you two just misspelled "exemplar". Probably on purpose. I'm sure of it. How dare you!

[–] obre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Whoops lol, not both of us just me. But yes, both entirely intentional and also daeviosly malicious 😈

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

You're truly an examlar of good spelling :P

[–] minyakcurry@monyet.cc 3 points 1 week ago

True, but also consistently under fire for actually being a good journalist. If you're reading this keep up the good fight!