this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
799 points (100.0% liked)

196

16092 readers
1766 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nifty@lemmy.world 113 points 1 month ago (36 children)

Tbh, a walkable city would also make for nice driving because it would alleviate congestion

[–] traches@sh.itjust.works 117 points 1 month ago (28 children)

Honestly at this point I want to live somewhere that’s actively hostile to cars

[–] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah fuck any disabled people that depend on their own car.

[–] traches@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People with trouble walking, service vehicles, delivery trucks, and such are fine. Literally nobody says they shouldn’t get to drive. They also represent like .001% of city traffic.

[–] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

"...actively hostile to cars"

"...disabled people that depend on their own cars"

[–] traches@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

you are very smart

[–] uis@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People with most disabilities can't have driver license. But they have powered wheelchairs.

[–] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's a couple of bad assumptions right there but let's put aside your narrow conception of what disabled means, you're still OK with fucking over some disabled people.

[–] Mothproof3007@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are disability adapted bikes that cover a wide range of physical disabilities (I've seen up to even only a single arm and head movements). I'm curious what disabilities would actually require exclusively a car for transportation and for which custom bikes wouldn't be enough, do you know of any ?

[–] uis@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Bikes require to keep balance. Powered wheelchairs do not.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

is the concept of a trike really that unfathomable to you?

[–] SeekPie@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

There's one in the original picture too lol

[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

you will find that most people use "bicycle" as a general term for basically anything of vaguely that shape and function.

no one (and i use that in the modern sense of "effectively no one", before you um ackshually me on that) says "cargo tricycle", they say "cargo bike" or "bakfiets", and bakfiets just means "cargo/box bike".

[–] Mothproof3007@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, three-wheeled bikes still count as bikes imo, they're much closer to being bikes than cars.

But I have nothing against powered wheelchair obviously, they aren't cars.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Everyone who does not have two good eyes, two arms and at least one leg can't legaly obtain driver's licese. Meanwhile powered wheelchair does not have such restrictions. Even person with one working muscle can drive powered wheelchair.

[–] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

That's a subset of disabled people & people without the use of legs or a arm can drive they just need a vehicle with special controls.powered wheelchairs don't fulfill all travel needs.

load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)