this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
367 points (83.9% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54669 readers
399 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 164 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I'd argue it's better to use actual alternatives. Half of the issue with free and open source software is that it's userbase is too small. If more people used it, it could actually improve in many ways.

Lets take gaming on Linux as an example. The userbase on steam is somewhere around 5%. So there is almost no incentive for developers to make games that run nativly on Linux. Its actually easier to run the games in a compatibility layer then to get a Linux port of a game. And although wine and proton work incredibly well, sometimes even running a game better than on windows; a Linux native version of every game would be ideal. Which will never happen with such a small userbase.

Next you have the terrible business practices of these companies. Even if you use the pirated versions. You are in their ecosystem and their community. You increase their profitability and their stock price simply by continuing the industry standard.

Pirated versions of software like this is excusable if you need it for work or sometihing. But imagine if instead of staying with the status quo, you use and help improve actual free and open source alternatives. Versons of software that don't steal your data or monetize how you use it by selling your input to others or stealing it for "AI" datasets.

Imagine using free and open source software that gives you feedom because your data stays on your devices, your creations belong to only yourself or who ypu choose to share it with, and you work with others to improve it; even if it's by just submitting bug reports. Imagine using something like that which you find so altruisticly beneficial that instead of pirating the software that has no respect for you, you donate money to the devs of free and open source software. Yes, I'm a pirate. But I do donate money to the right causes and something that protects my freedom is worth both my time and my money.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 41 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] VinS@sh.itjust.works 27 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If you mean by that "This person is right" I totally agree with you

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 months ago

Yes. Exactly like that.

[–] msage@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago

Yes, you also fuck

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I agree with everything, but want to add that 5% is actually a huge incentive and I'm very very optimistic about the future of linux gaming.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 months ago

This is also data from an opt-in survey of only one kind of user. The real number of Linux users is probably somewhat higher due to the higher level of privacy conscientiousness in the community.

[–] diskmaster23@lemmy.one 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but the gaming isn't bad on Linux.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 4 points 4 months ago

I agree. I only use linux. Which includes for gaming. And I game a lot.