this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

AnarchyChess

5163 readers
43 users here now

Holy hell

Other chess communities:
!Chess@lemmy.ml
!chessbeginners@sh.itjust.works

Matrix space

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I'd love to watch someone try to do this at a tournament. Just swapping out their pawn for an extra King with a deadpan expression.

[–] Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] pancakes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I misunderstood the rules and shoved my king into my mouth, with a deadpan expression.

Too bad they cut that out of a clip of Queen's Gambit.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The game would end when any king is captured so having more than one (as opposed to making the pawn a queen) would be a strict disadvantage. I'd allow it.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Incorrect, the game ends when a king cannot avoid capture. As such, your statement is wrong and I feel betrayed.