this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
887 points (98.8% liked)

News

23397 readers
3618 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Satanic Temple objects to governor’s push for more religion in schools and says members could act as student chaplains

Dark messengers of satanism could soon be walking the hallways of Florida’s public schools, and it’s a consequence of hard-right governor Ron DeSantis’s push for more religion in education.

Members of the Satanic Temple say they are poised to act as volunteer chaplains under a state law that took effect this week opening campuses to “additional counseling and support to students” from outside organizations.

Although HB 931 leaves the implementation of chaplain programs to individual school districts, and only requires schools to list a volunteer’s religion “if any”, DeSantis has made clear its intent is to restore the tenets of Christianity to public education.

Without the bill, DeSantis said at its signing in April: “You’re basically saying that God has no place [on campus]. That’s wrong.”

The satanists see the law, which comes amid a vigorous theocratic drive into education by the religious right nationally, as an equal opportunity: if Christian chaplains are permitted access to students, often at the most vulnerable and impressionable stages of their lives, then so are they.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Guessing you didn't read the article, since they elaborated more about the Satanic temple further down?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I read it. Burying the lede doesn't excuse the beginning.

[–] awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Dude, it's tongue in cheek. It's meant to be funny. Even if you don't find it so, it very obviously wasn't meant to be taken seriously

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You assume the general populace can recognize intent in writing, and differentiate between things like comedy, satire, and factual statements when they aren't explicitly declared in context.

The fact there is currently so much successful propaganda spread worldwide through traditional media that we're seeing a large resurgence of extreme nationalism, xenophobia, and Nazism again, along with a current very public genocide with a ton of public support, proves that to be factually incorrect. The average person is fucking stupid.

[–] awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Are we then supposed to lower the standard of all writing to the lowest common denominator, then? I get your point, but I'm not sure the solution is to move to grade school levels of communication.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 4 points 4 months ago

For some things, yeah, probably. If you're trying to inform people, you need to adjust your communication to something they'll understand (and you can stomach).

You don't need to change your novel to appeal to everyone.

A lot of marketing and journalism already targets a sixth grade level because many people don't read well.

[–] Pips@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's a British news outlet. Just because you're reading it in the U.S. doesn't mean it was written with an American sense of humor in mind.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago

Clearly no one but the British can possibly be familiar with British humor.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

I think it’s funny to call every Christian leader a pedophile rapist because it tends to be true. But for some reason the guardian doesn’t start every article about Christians that way…

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Lots of people will take it seriously and they will not read to the end where it is explained. In fact, what many of them will see is that part in a little preview blurb and get worked up about it.

[–] awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well, let them? The people who would take it seriously and get worked up about it are the ones who are in support of this stupid law in the first place.

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world -4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So, let’s just strengthen that outrage muscle then, huh?

[–] awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

What are they gonna do that they're not already trying to do? Revolt? Subvert the rule of law? Shoot up some schools?

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’ve spent the past decade thinking “surely they won’t get worse than this” and they always do

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Literally more of the last one, yes.

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I read it.

I've heard this lie before.

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I bet you’re going to tell me you read it somewhere

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

yes, FS wrote a whiny post about how he didn't know coupons existed on the internet, and how that it is everyone else's fault.

He then proceeded to misread everyone's comments, while following up with claims that no-one said X or Y, when they did. It was an absolute joke of a post.

So no, when FS claims he read something, I've got that (x) doubt meme on standby.

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Sorry, I was just attempting to make a joke, nothing more than that!